Influenza vaccination: a comparison of two outreach strategies.
Identifieur interne : 000D75 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000D74; suivant : 000D76Influenza vaccination: a comparison of two outreach strategies.
Auteurs : T M Gerace [Royaume-Uni] ; J F SangsterSource :
- Family medicine [ 0742-3225 ]
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- MESH :
- administration et posologie : Vaccins antigrippaux.
- Acceptation des soins par le patient, Grippe humaine, Humains, Médecine de famille, Ontario.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- chemical , administration & dosage : Influenza Vaccines.
- geographic : Ontario.
- prevention & control : Influenza, Human.
- Family Practice, Humans, Patient Acceptance of Health Care.
Abstract
Despite longstanding recommendations for annual influenza vaccination of all people age 65 and older, only 20% or less are regularly immunized. This paper compares two methods of immunization outreach to the elderly population. In 1985 and 1986 vaccine was offered to patients who attended one family practice for any reason during the months of October and November. In 1985 if patients had not received vaccine by October 31 an informational letter recommending immunization was also mailed. In 1986 nonimmunized patients were telephoned by the family practice nurse and informed of the rationale, availability, and advisability of receiving the vaccine. The immunization rate improved in patients attending the practice over the two study years. Additional outreach efforts showed a high degree of failure or refusal to receive immunization.
PubMed: 3342961
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Influenza vaccination: a comparison of two outreach strategies.</title><author><name sortKey="Gerace, T M" sort="Gerace, T M" uniqKey="Gerace T" first="T M" last="Gerace">T M Gerace</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Family Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London.</nlm:affiliation><country>Royaume-Uni</country><placeName><settlement type="city">Londres</settlement><region type="country">Angleterre</region><region type="région" nuts="1">Grand Londres</region></placeName><wicri:orgArea>Department of Family Medicine, University of Western Ontario</wicri:orgArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sangster, J F" sort="Sangster, J F" uniqKey="Sangster J" first="J F" last="Sangster">J F Sangster</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="????"><PubDate><MedlineDate>1988 Jan-Feb</MedlineDate></PubDate></date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:3342961</idno><idno type="pmid">3342961</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000C80</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000C80</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000C80</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">000C80</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000C80</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Influenza vaccination: a comparison of two outreach strategies.</title><author><name sortKey="Gerace, T M" sort="Gerace, T M" uniqKey="Gerace T" first="T M" last="Gerace">T M Gerace</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Family Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London.</nlm:affiliation><country>Royaume-Uni</country><placeName><settlement type="city">Londres</settlement><region type="country">Angleterre</region><region type="région" nuts="1">Grand Londres</region></placeName><wicri:orgArea>Department of Family Medicine, University of Western Ontario</wicri:orgArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sangster, J F" sort="Sangster, J F" uniqKey="Sangster J" first="J F" last="Sangster">J F Sangster</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Family medicine</title><idno type="ISSN">0742-3225</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Family Practice</term><term>Humans</term><term>Influenza Vaccines (administration & dosage)</term><term>Influenza, Human (prevention & control)</term><term>Ontario</term><term>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Acceptation des soins par le patient</term><term>Grippe humaine ()</term><term>Humains</term><term>Médecine de famille</term><term>Ontario</term><term>Vaccins antigrippaux (administration et posologie)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="administration & dosage" xml:lang="en"><term>Influenza Vaccines</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en"><term>Ontario</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="administration et posologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Vaccins antigrippaux</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="prevention & control" xml:lang="en"><term>Influenza, Human</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Family Practice</term><term>Humans</term><term>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Acceptation des soins par le patient</term><term>Grippe humaine</term><term>Humains</term><term>Médecine de famille</term><term>Ontario</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Despite longstanding recommendations for annual influenza vaccination of all people age 65 and older, only 20% or less are regularly immunized. This paper compares two methods of immunization outreach to the elderly population. In 1985 and 1986 vaccine was offered to patients who attended one family practice for any reason during the months of October and November. In 1985 if patients had not received vaccine by October 31 an informational letter recommending immunization was also mailed. In 1986 nonimmunized patients were telephoned by the family practice nurse and informed of the rationale, availability, and advisability of receiving the vaccine. The immunization rate improved in patients attending the practice over the two study years. Additional outreach efforts showed a high degree of failure or refusal to receive immunization.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">3342961</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>1988</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>01</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2005</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>22</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0742-3225</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>20</Volume><Issue>1</Issue><PubDate><MedlineDate>1988 Jan-Feb</MedlineDate></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Family medicine</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Fam Med</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Influenza vaccination: a comparison of two outreach strategies.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>43-5</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>Despite longstanding recommendations for annual influenza vaccination of all people age 65 and older, only 20% or less are regularly immunized. This paper compares two methods of immunization outreach to the elderly population. In 1985 and 1986 vaccine was offered to patients who attended one family practice for any reason during the months of October and November. In 1985 if patients had not received vaccine by October 31 an informational letter recommending immunization was also mailed. In 1986 nonimmunized patients were telephoned by the family practice nurse and informed of the rationale, availability, and advisability of receiving the vaccine. The immunization rate improved in patients attending the practice over the two study years. Additional outreach efforts showed a high degree of failure or refusal to receive immunization.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Gerace</LastName><ForeName>T M</ForeName><Initials>TM</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Family Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Sangster</LastName><ForeName>J F</ForeName><Initials>JF</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Fam Med</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8306464</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0742-3225</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D007252">Influenza Vaccines</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005194" MajorTopicYN="N">Family Practice</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007252" MajorTopicYN="N">Influenza Vaccines</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000008" MajorTopicYN="Y">administration & dosage</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007251" MajorTopicYN="N">Influenza, Human</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000517" MajorTopicYN="Y">prevention & control</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009864" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Ontario</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010342" MajorTopicYN="Y">Patient Acceptance of Health Care</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>1988</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>1</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>1988</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>1988</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">3342961</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Royaume-Uni</li></country><region><li>Angleterre</li><li>Grand Londres</li></region><settlement><li>Londres</li></settlement></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Sangster, J F" sort="Sangster, J F" uniqKey="Sangster J" first="J F" last="Sangster">J F Sangster</name></noCountry><country name="Royaume-Uni"><region name="Angleterre"><name sortKey="Gerace, T M" sort="Gerace, T M" uniqKey="Gerace T" first="T M" last="Gerace">T M Gerace</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/GrippeCanadaV3/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000D75 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000D75 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Sante
|area= GrippeCanadaV3
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:3342961
|texte= Influenza vaccination: a comparison of two outreach strategies.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:3342961" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a GrippeCanadaV3
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.35. |  |